15 Top Twitter Accounts To Discover More About Federal Employers

Workers Compensation Vs Federal Employers Liability Act

If workers in high-risk industries are injured, they are generally protected by laws that hold employers to higher safety standards. Railroad workers, for example are covered by the Federal Employers' Liability Act (FELA).

In order to be entitled to damages under FELA workers must prove their injury was caused partly due to negligence on the part of the employer.

FELA Vs. Workers' Compensation

While both workers compensation and FELA are laws that offer protection to employees, there are significant differences between them. These distinctions are related to the process of filing claims, fault assessment and the kinds of damages awarded in instances of injury or death. Workers' compensation law provides rapid relief to injured workers regardless of who is at fault for the accident. FELA in contrast demands that claimants prove that their railroad employer was at least partly responsible for their injuries.

Additionally, FELA allows workers to sue federal courts, rather than the state's workers compensation system. It also provides the option of a jury trial. It also has specific guidelines for the determination of damages. For instance, a worker can receive compensation of up to 80 percent of their average weekly earnings, as well as medical expenses and an appropriate cost of living allowance. Furthermore, a FELA suit could include compensation for pain and suffering.

In order for a worker to be successful in a fela railroad case they must prove that negligence by the railroad played at least a role in the resulting injury or death. This is a far higher standard than what is required to be successful in a claim under workers compensation. This requirement is a result of FELA's history. In 1908, Congress passed FELA in an effort to increase safety on the rails by allowing workers to sue for large damages if they suffered injuries in the course of their work.

In the wake of more than a century of FELA litigation railway companies are now able to implement safer equipment, but the trains, tracks, railroad yards and machine shops are one of the most hazardous places to work. This is what makes FELA important for ensuring the safety of all railway workers and taking action against employers' inability to safeguard their employees.

If you are a railway worker who has suffered an injury on the job, it is crucial that you seek legal advice as soon as you can. Contacting a BLET designated legal counsel (DLC) firm is the best way to begin. Click here to find a BLET-approved DLC firm in your area.

FELA vs. Jones Act

The Jones Act is a federal law that permits seamen to sue their employers in the event of injuries and deaths. The law was passed in 1920 to ensure that seamen are protected from risking their lives and limbs on the high seas and other navigable waters because they aren't covered by the laws on workers' compensation like those for land-based workers. It was closely modeled on the Federal Employers Liability Act (fela lawsuit settlements) which covers railroad workers, and was specifically designed to meet the specific requirements of maritime workers.

The Jones Act, unlike workers compensation laws which limit the amount of negligence recovery to the maximum amount of lost wages for an injured worker is a law that allows unlimited liability in maritime cases that involve negligence by employers. The Jones Act does not require plaintiffs to prove that an employer's negligence led to their death or injury. The Jones Act also allows injured seamen to sue their employers for unspecified damages like future and past pain and suffering as well as future and past loss of earnings capacity and mental distress.

A claim for compensation by a seaman under the Jones Act may be brought in a federal or state court. In a lawsuit brought under the Jones Act, plaintiffs have the right to a trial by jury. This is a completely different method than the majority of workers' compensation laws which are generally statute-based and do not grant injured employees the right to a trial by jury.

In the case of Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. Sorrell, the US Supreme Court was asked to clarify whether a seaman's contribution to his or his own injury was subject to a higher standard of proof than the standard of proof in FELA cases. The Court decided that the lower courts were correct when they ruled that a seaman must prove that his role in the accident directly caused his injury.

Sorrell was awarded US$1.5 million in compensation for his injury. Sorrell's employer, Norfolk Southern, argued that the court's instructions to the jury were erroneous as they instructed the jury to determine Norfolk responsible only for any negligence that directly contributed to the injury. Norfolk argued that the causation standard should be the same in FELA and Jones Act cases.

FELA vs. Safety Appliance Act

The Federal Employers' Liability Act allows railroad workers to sue directly their employers for negligence that led to injuries. This is an important distinction for injured workers working in high-risk fields. After an accident, they are able to be compensated and provide for their families. The FELA was enacted in 1908 in recognition of the inherent dangers associated with the job and to establish standard liability requirements for companies that operate railroads.

FELA requires railroads to provide a safe working environment for their employees, including the use of properly maintained and repaired equipment. This includes everything from trains and cars to tracks, switches, and other safety gear. To be successful, an injured worker must demonstrate that their employer has did not fulfill their obligation of care by failing to provide them with a reasonably secure working environment, and that their injury was the direct result of this negligence.

This requirement can be a challenge for some workers, particularly when a malfunctioning piece of equipment is involved in an accident. This is why having a lawyer who has experience in FELA cases can be helpful. A lawyer who understands the safety requirements for railroaders and the regulations that regulate these requirements, can help bolster a worker's legal case by providing a solid legal foundation.

Some railroad laws that may strengthen a worker's FELA case include the Locomotive Inspection Act and the Railroad Safety Appliance Act. These laws are referred to as "railway statutes" and require that rail corporations, and in certain instances, their agents (like managers, supervisors, or executives of companies) must adhere to these rules in order to ensure the safety of their employees. Violating these statutes can constitute negligence in and of itself, meaning that a violation of any one of these rules is enough to justify a claim for injury under FELA.

A common example of an infraction to the railroad statute is the case where an automatic coupler or grab iron is not properly installed or has a defect. This is clearly a violation of the Safety Appliance Act, and should an employee be injured because of it they could be entitled to compensation. However, the law also stipulates that if a plaintiff was a contributor to the injury in some way (even if minimal) the amount they claim will be reduced.

FELA vs. Boiler Inspection Act

FELA is a set of federal laws which allow railroad workers and their families to recover substantial damages for injuries sustained during work. This includes compensation for lost earnings as well as benefits like disability payments, medical expenses and funeral costs. In addition when an injury causes permanent impairment or death, a claim can be made for punitive damages. This is to penalize the railroad and discourage other railroads from engaging in similar actions.

Congress approved FELA in 1908 in response to public outrage over the shocking rate of accidents and fatalities on the railroads. Before FELA there was no legal way for railroad workers to sue their employers if they were injured at work. Railroad workers who were injured and their families were often denied financial assistance during the time they were unable work due to their injuries or negligence on the part of the railroad.

Railroad workers who are injured can bring claims for damages under FELA in either state or federal court. The act replaced defenses like the Fellow Servant Doctrine or the assumption of risk by establishing the concept of comparative fault. The act determines a railroad worker’s part of the blame for an accident by comparing their actions with the actions of their coworkers. The law also allows for a jury trial.

If a railroad company violates the federal railroad safety law, such as The Safety Appliance Act and Boiler Inspection Act it is completely liable for any injuries that result from it. It is not necessary for the railroad to prove that it was negligent, or even that it was a to the cause of an accident. You may also file an action for injuries caused by exhaust fumes from diesel engines under the Boiler Inspection Act.

If you have been injured while working as a railroad worker you should contact an experienced railroad injury lawyer immediately. The right lawyer can assist you in submitting your claim and receiving the highest amount of benefits during the time that you are not working because of your injury.